Kim – Errol enjoed making this movie and seeing India!

04 Apr

— Tina


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  1. Anonymous

    April 5, 2011 at 5:49 am

    June 1972?? Or just a slip of keyboard and you meant 52? Have you got the mag yourself?

  2. Anonymous

    April 5, 2011 at 5:50 am

    Argh, sorry Tina, my fault, I mixed up the captions and the pictures!!!!! Don't know what's wrong with me, it's early in the morning. Sorry again!

  3. Anonymous

    April 5, 2011 at 3:50 pm

    Hi Inga;
    No problem at all!

  4. Anonymous

    April 5, 2011 at 3:52 pm

    Hi Inga;
    I don't have the magazine – but it is 1972!

  5. Anonymous

    April 6, 2011 at 5:47 am

    I think that this one is especially interesting because it shows the way in which even MGM played with Errol's image as a womaniser. The lady depicted here and on many other publicity stills for “Kim” plays only a minor role in the film, and yet it appears as if she is his great love interest! Also, apparently they show him without the beard he had to grow because he looks more attractive without – or maybe there was another overlapping of time as in the Sisters' case?

  6. Anonymous

    April 6, 2011 at 4:29 pm

    Hi Inga,
    You are so right! Once an image it stamped on the person it is very hard to get rid of it! She had a very minor role and there were no so called love scenes in the movie. Maybe she had somebody behind her to further her carrier for which reason the picture was taken.
    Right no beard! Maybe he was already in “Montana” when the picture was taken? Good observation!
    Take care,