Removal of at least one slanderous publication.

After finding
last year a slanderous paragraph about Errol on the Hermann
Erben Wikipedia page about Errol being anti-Semitic and various other nasty things and that a letter exists to proof this
allegation!
I went to work and  requested this paragraph to be removed!  I had to repeat my entries several
times as Wikipedia removed my entries consistently and I re-entered it just as
consistently. 

Below is now the confirmation of
deletion of that paragraph – small success, but one less slanderous entry about
Errol.

My words below are in an edited format by
Wikipedia.  PROOF is the word to use! Also, read it carefully you will
notice that it is not slander when a person is dead.  How
convenient for all those slanderous ink slingers.

Talk:Hermann Erben from Wikipedia

Nothing but slanderous talk about Errol Flynn! It says about the
letter “if genuine”! If genuine indeed – is the key word! Is
there such letter? If so, it MUST be produced, where is it? Why even
speak about something that cannot be substantiated? Therefore it is only
hearsay and only slanderous talk about Errol Flynn, who never was
“ANTI” to any race, creed or color!

To the editor of this page! It says in your rules and
regulations that what is printed in Wikipedia must be verifiable. Your
statement of Errol Flynn's letter is not verifiable! Where is the
letter? If you are unable to produce this “letter” you should remove
this paragraph as it is not verifiable and only malicious slander! —Preceding comment added by Bariebel (talk • contribs) 23:25, 31 January
2010 (UTC)

Technically, it's neither slander nor libel because Flynn is dead (or that's how I
understand it, anyway). And – from what I understand – it is
verifiable, in that it's been quoted in a reputable scholarly biography
of Flynn. However, it is not relevant to an article about
Erben, and so I have removed it. DS (talk) 15:52, 2 March 2010
(UTC)

— Tina