RSS
 

Errol’s Van Gogh to be Auctioned!

30 Nov

Our friend Stefan Koldehoff writes to us:

Dear David, maybe it’s interesting for you to know that the Van Gogh Painting that Errol Flynn once owned will be offered at Sotheby’s London on 5 February 2014.

I am attaching the catalogue text.

Best wishes –
Stefan Koldehoff.
5099000
—–

VINCENT VAN GOGH
1853 – 1890

L’HOMME EST EN MER

oil on canvas
66 by 51cm. / 26 by 20in.
Painted in Saint-Rémy in October 1889.

PROVENANCE:
Dr Paul Gachet, Auvers-sur-Oise
Paul Gachet fils, Auvers-sur-Oise (by descent from the above)
Paul Cassirer, Amsterdam & Paul Graupe, Germany & New York (acquired from the above on 30th May 1939)
Caesar R. Diorio, New York (acquired from the above on 7th July 1943)
Errol Flynn, United States (acquired from the above by 1944)
Acquavella Galleries, Inc., New York
John T. Dorrance, Jr., Philadelphia (acquired from the above in 1964. Sold: Sotheby’s, New York, The Collection of John T. Dorrance, Jr., 18th October 1989, lot 27)
Acquired by the present owner in 1993

EXHIBITED:
Paris, Salon des Indépendants, Vincent van Gogh, 1905, no. 22, illustrated in the catalogue

LITERATURE:
Louis Piérard, The Tragic Life of Vincent van Gogh, London, 1925, illustrated p. 11 Jacob-Baart de la Faille, L’Œuvre de Vincent van Gogh, catalogue raisonné, Paris & Brussels, 1928, vol. I, no. 644, catalogued p. 182; vol. II, no. 644, illustrated pl. CLXXVI

Florent Fels, Vincent van Gogh, Paris, 1928, illustrated p. 83 (titled L’Atre)

Willem Scherjon & W. Jos de Gruyter, Vincent van Gogh’s Great Period – Arles, St. Rémy and Auvers sur Oise (Complete Catalogue), Amsterdam, 1937, St. Rémy no. 86, illustrated p. 280 (titled Seated Woman with Child)

Jacob-Baart de la Faille, Vincent van Gogh, Paris, 1939, no. F.644, fig. 654, illustrated p. 451

Georg Schmidt, Van Gogh, Bern, 1947, no. 40, illustrated

The Complete Letters of Vincent van Gogh, London, 1958, vol. III, letter no. 610, mentioned p. 223

Fritz Novotny, ‘Die Bilder van Goghs nach fremden Vorbildern’, in Festschrift Kurt Badt, Berlin, 1961, pp. 213-230

Jacob-Baart de la Faille, The Works of Vincent van Gogh, His Paintings and Drawings, Amsterdam, 1970, no. F644, illustrated p. 257

Paolo Lecaldano, Tout l’œuvre peint de Van Gogh, Paris, 1971, no. 705, illustrated p. 221

Jacques Lassaigne, Van Gogh, Paris, 1974, illustrated in colour p. 60 (image inverted)

Jan Hulsker, The Complete van Gogh: Paintings, Drawings, Sketches, New York, 1984, no. 1805, illustrated p. 416 (titled Woman with Baby, Sitting at the Fireside)

Ronald Pickvance, Van Gogh in Saint-Rémy and Auvers (exhibition catalogue), The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 1986-87, illustrated p. 48

Jan Hulsker, The New Complete Van Gogh: Paintings, Drawings, Sketches, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, 1996, no. 1805, illustrated p. 416 (titled Woman with Baby, Sitting at the Fireside)

Cornelia Homburg, The Copy Turns Original: Vincent van Gogh and a New Approach to Traditional Art Practice, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, 1996, no. 50, illustrated

Ingo F. Walther & Rainer Metzger, Vincent van Gogh: The Complete Paintings, Cologne, 2001, illustrated in colour p. 552

Chris Stolwijk, Sjraar van Heugten, Leo Jansen & Andreas Blühm (eds.), Vincent’s Choice: Van Gogh’s Musée Imaginaire, London, 2003, mentioned p. 102

Marije Vellekoop & Roelie Zwikker, Vincent van Gogh: Drawings, Amsterdam, 2007, vol. 4, no. 446b, illustrated in colour p. 390

Leo Jansen, Hans Luijten & Nienke Bakker (eds.), Vincent van Gogh: The Letters, London, 2009, vol. 5, illustrated in colour p. 120 (titled The Husband is at Sea); letter 810, mentioned p. 120

Walter Feilchenfeldt, Vincent van Gogh: die Gemälde 1886-1890. Händler, Sammler, Ausstellungen, die frühen Provenienzen, Wädenswil, 2009, mentioned p. 190

Painted at Saint-Rémy in October 1889, Van Gogh’s haunting depiction of a young mother, pining for her husband away at sea, is a brilliant example of the artist’s transformative vision of a time-honoured subject. Van Gogh arrived at the asylum in Saint-Rémy in May 1889, and during the following months produced some of his most celebrated masterpieces, including The Starry Night. His work of this period is notable for the bright, shimmering palette, and the present work displays his favourite tonal contrasts used in a number of other works executed around this time (fig. 1). In L’Homme est en merthe warm yellow and ochre hues of the fire and its warm glow against the fireplace and the floor provide a dynamic contrast to the cooler blue tones of the woman’s dress and the wall behind her. The radiance of the fire is beautifully reflected on the faces of the mother and her baby, each of them absorbed in their own dream world. The evocative, rather than descriptive, title adds to the meditative, dreamy atmosphere of the composition.
L’Homme est en mer is Van Gogh’s own interpretation of a work of the same title by his contemporary, the French painter Virginie Demont-Breton (fig. 2), which was exhibited at the Salon of 1889 and received great praise in the reviews. In October of that year, Van Gogh wrote to his brother Theo, describing the present work and his reinvention of the image: ‘I’ve copied that woman with a child sitting beside a hearth by Mrs Demont–Breton, almost all violet, I’m certainly going to continue copying, it will give me a collection of my own, and when it’s sufficiently large and complete, I’ll give the whole lot to a school’ (L. Jansen, H. Luijten & N. Bakker (eds.), op. cit., letter no. 810, p. 120). Cornelia Homburg wrote about the appeal of Demont-Breton’s image to Van Gogh: ‘The woman with her baby reproduces in such a large size provided a suitable model for Van Gogh, who was always looking for opportunities to study the figure. In terms of content it is likely that the subject reminded him of his own masterpiece La Berceuse, in which motherhood was a central theme […]. In terms of color Van Gogh used his favorite contrast: the fire extended a warm golden glow illuminating the figures, while the rest of the composition was kept in violet hues’ (C. Homburg, op. cit., p. 94).
Van Gogh’s copies of other artists’ work played an important role in the development of his late œuvre. Based mainly on black and white reproductions sent to him by Theo, Van Gogh’s versions are more than mere copies, for he imbued them with his own sense of colour and form, as he informed his brother: ‘And then I improvise colour on it but, being me, not completely of course, but seeking memories of their paintings – but the memory, the vague consonance of colours that are in the same sentiment, if not right – that’s my own interpretation’ (ibid., letter no. 805, p. 101). By autumn 1889, he had produced a large number of painted copies from artists like Rembrandt and Delacroix to his contemporaries Daumier and Gauguin and, most famously, twenty-one paintings after Millet (fig. 3). This tradition of studying work by other artists resonated with many avant-garde artists in the twentieth century, the most notable examples being Picasso’s interpretations of Old Masters such as Ingres’s Odalisque, Delacroix’s Les Femmes d’Alger and Velázquez’s Las Meninas.
During his two-year stay in Paris from 1886 to 1888 Van Gogh was introduced to the latest developments in art and to several of the most innovative painters working in the French capital, including Signac, Seurat, Toulouse-Lautrec and Bernard. With the encouragement and company of his brother Theo, Van Gogh frequented the many cafés and taverns where he exchanged both ideas and canvases with his new circle of friends. The city also offered him several opportunities to view the critically acclaimed works of the Impressionists, whose paintings were most notably featured at their eighth and final group exhibition in 1886. Van Gogh rapidly absorbed all of the disparate artistic styles and techniques pioneered by the Parisian avant-garde, and quickly formulated his own highly distinctive pictorial language. This remarkable work is a testament to the unique and imaginative style he developed during his Paris years, and the explosive colour palette he employed for this composition is also evident in his other canvases of this era.
Shortly after his arrival in Paris, in September-October 1886 Van Gogh wrote in a letter to a fellow artist Horace Mann Livens: ‘And mind my dear fellow, that Paris is Paris, there is but one Paris and however hard living may be here and if it becomes worse and harder even – the French air clears up the brain and does one good – a world of good’ (ibid., vol. 3, letter no. 569, p. 365). The artist’s enthusiasm for his new surroundings was soon reflected in his work. It was during his stay in Paris that Van Gogh’s art underwent a major stylistic shift, and the most important change was in the diversifying of his palette and his turn towards the use of bright, contrasted colours. Writing of the effect Paris had on the artist, John Rewald commented: ‘Van Gogh was now extremely eager to put to use all the new things he had learned. Gradually he abandoned the dark and earthy colors he had used in his early work […]. In Paris his paintings not only became chromatically lighter, their mood also brightened’ (J. Rewald, Post-Impressionism, from Van Gogh to Gauguin, New York, 1956, p. 36).
The first owner of record of L’Homme est en mer was Dr Paul Gachet, the French physician who treated Van Gogh towards the end of the artist’s life at Auvers-sur-Oise. Gachet (1828-1909), who was himself an amateur painter, was a great supporter of Impressionist and Post-Impressionist art and came into possession of some of Van Gogh’s most important paintings, including the well-known portrait of himself (fig. 4). The present work was later acquired by the actor Errol Flynn (1909-1959; fig. 5), who is best known for his leading-man status during Hollywood’s golden age of cinema. In 1964 the picture entered the collection of John T. Dorrance Jr. (1919-1989), the heir to the Campbell Soup fortune. Dorrance’s collection encompassed some of the most important examples of Impressionist, Post-Impressionist and Modern works of art by artists including Monet, Cézanne, Gauguin, Matisse and Picasso. After his death the collection was sold at auction at Sotheby’s New York in 1989.

— David DeWitt

 
5 Comments

Posted in Main Page

 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  1. Inga

    December 2, 2013 at 3:51 pm

    I’m really wondering what happened to the painting after EF left for Europe – did Lili sell it? Or who else did? What happened to all of Errol’s personal stuff when the house was sold? …

    Report this comment

     
    • Tim

      December 2, 2013 at 8:30 pm

      Great questions, Inga. I find both sides of the above-identified provenance fascinating, and maybe clues. First, Errol appears to have purchased The Man is at Sea in ’44, from renowned art restorer Caesar Diorio (a pioneer x-ray art analyst who had strong affiliations with the Huntington Museum near LA, as well as with the Metropolitan in New York.) … Then, at some date unstated, the renowned Acquavella Galleries is said to have obtained it from Errol (as opposed to from Lili or the (posthumous) Estate of Errol Flynn, IRS or some other person or entity.) Then, in ’64, Campbell Soup heir John Torrance Jr., takes ownership from Acquavella. Still somewhat a mystery when and how the painting left Errol, but some fascinating and very helpful clues! … I hope John Decker’s not involved!

      Report this comment

       
    • David DeWitt

      December 3, 2013 at 9:15 pm

      I have read some of Errol’s letters asking for certain items back like silverware. His writing desk and the Decker painting are at Pat’s house in Jamaica.

      Report this comment