I am sorry to be so bold and ask the much more informed body of this membership a few questions, which are of great interests to me. It puzzles me very much as to why Errol's estate was for 14 years in probate, does anybody know the real reason? 14 years is a very long time! There was a will and Patrice received the estate, there was Nora who contested the will, there was Beverly who contested the will, but all this could have not taken 14 years, there must have been other issues - what were the issues?
Why did the sale of the ZACA did not go through as arranged in Vancouver? I thought the papers were signed? Has anybody conclusive and irrefutable information about this situation as to why and how this long probate could have ever happend? In an interview Patrice says the ZACA was taken away from her. How - if it was under probate? All this is another great mystery in Errol's aftermath! We are told Patrice had no money, but how does this come into the picture? Once there are assets, there are no questions about money, because the money is in the assets! I think Errol was shafted and mislead all his life by somebody or another! It is horrible to think, but I am coming somehow to the conclusion he never had an honest person around him? I can believe that he was very naive in many ways and things, but nobody is that naive! Your valued insight would be very much appreciated!
|
|||||||
|
Subscribe to This Blog by Email!
This Month
Month Archive
Login
Search
Recent Articles
Recent Comments
Recent Photos
![]() Flynn's Favorites
|
Errol's estate in probate for 14 years?
Comments
Re: Errol's estate in probate for 14 years?
by
john
on Thu 25 Feb 2010 04:52 AM PST | Profile | Permanent Link
Tina, Wow, 14 years really is a long time. If that is the way it is, it has all the hallmarks of the US federal government at work, in particular, the IRS. Errol and the IRS were at war over his supposed unpaid taxes, and Lili Damita's lawyers were also snapping at his heels. I would hazard a guess that the IRS was trying to take ownership of the Jamaica properties, and international tax law sounds like a nightmare. That is just my hunch anyway. I will try and check it out. John
Re: Re: Errol's estate in probate for 14 years?
by
Tina Nyary
on Thu 25 Feb 2010 10:25 AM PST | Profile | Permanent Link
Hi John;
That would be great! The IRS want money NOW keeping the estate that long in probate would not serve the IRS very well, plus the IRS received all the royalties from his books, that should pay a fair lump! Lily received Mulholland Farm and sold it - that should have paid her off. I think there is a lot more to it than the IRS or as they say "The Eye Meets". Re: Re: Errol's estate in probate for 14 years?
by
Tina Nyary
on Thu 25 Feb 2010 01:50 PM PST | Profile | Permanent Link
Hi John;
Maybe you also could find out while you are at it who was the Executor or Executors? Thank you! Re: Errol's estate in probate for 14 years?
by
Kathleen
on Thu 25 Feb 2010 11:46 PM PST | Profile | Permanent Link
Found this on the web . . .
Famous Last Will and Testament Actor Errol Flynn About the last will and testament of famous American actor Errol Flynn. WHERE THERE'S A WILL ERROL FLYNN, U.S. actor, died 1959 Last Will: Flynn provided $10,000 apiece to two daughters plus their support, $5,000 to his son Sean, West Indies property to his parents, and the residue to his widow, Patrice Wymore. The will, which may in any case have overdrawn an insolvent account, recognized none of his numerous teenaged mistresses. Figures variously given as to the estate's actual worth ranged from just over a million to almost $2 million; but because Flynn apparently failed to honor a 1957 bank debt, the estate has been in and out of the courts and in contention ever since his death. Re: Errol's estate in probate for 14 years?
by
Kathleen
on Mon 01 Mar 2010 11:22 PM PST | Profile | Permanent Link
This took of two of the fourteen - http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1955&dat=19610301&id=S44jAAAAIBAJ&sjid=SpwFAAAAIBAJ&pg=4054,396816
|
||||||
