Take a look at the attached photo and tell us what is peculiar about it. So far, I have no answers, as I don't own the photo and can't properly analyze it at it's prohibitively small size.
R
— Robzak
Take a look at the attached photo and tell us what is peculiar about it. So far, I have no answers, as I don't own the photo and can't properly analyze it at it's prohibitively small size.
R
— Robzak
Posted in New Articles
ChocoTheme by .css{mayo} | powered by WordPress
Anonymous
January 19, 2012 at 7:10 pm
That Errol is pouring the milk from a flower vase.
Anonymous
January 19, 2012 at 7:19 pm
Try again. This one may be very tough.
Anonymous
January 19, 2012 at 8:23 pm
Here is one of yet the same situation! But NO mustache!!!!!

Anonymous
January 19, 2012 at 8:39 pm
Wow, this is indeed tricky. In the background, you can see the wedding cake. The clothes and all are the same as on the wedding photo where they look at their cake. So they must have been taken at the same publitiy shooting. But on that other famous photo, Errol does not have a mustache, whereas he has one here. That it?
Anonymous
January 19, 2012 at 8:52 pm
Bingo! David, give this girl a prize.
Anonymous
January 19, 2012 at 8:55 pm
Tricky Robert!
There are several things one could see as odd but not peculiar – like only one water glass; Errol not sitting at his place mat, which is to the left of him; in the back on the sideboard are the wedding cake statuettes in a bowl instead a plate or…. nothing peculiar about that.
But peculiar it is, at least that I can see, is the teacup Lili is suppose to hold – it looks like it is more or less like floating. The position of her hand is not supporting the cup properly.
Lili has not a grip or hold on the cup with the hand shown in the picture – she must be supporting the cup with the other hand not visible in the picture. Errol is no help he has his hand in his lap!
Now how am I doing?
Anonymous
January 19, 2012 at 9:16 pm
Now that is peculiar if there ever was a peculiarity!
On the other hand, one still can see the outline of a mustache maybe it was just the lighting that did not show the mustache as readily! A photographic peculiarity?
On the other hand, Errol could have said – hold on – give me a minute – I go and shave off my mustache for posterity so people will guess about it 77 years from now! Hahaha
What ever the case these two pictures are peculiar!
Great job Inga!
Anonymous
January 19, 2012 at 10:39 pm
Shacks – I never could have guessed that one as I have none of these pictures.
Anonymous
January 19, 2012 at 11:55 pm
I could have never guessed it myself, Robert!!!
Anonymous
January 20, 2012 at 12:22 am
Here is another copy of the same phot, sans mustache tampering:

Anonymous
January 20, 2012 at 6:32 am
Ready for my prize, thanks! It was really tough, only when I noticed the wedding cake, I remembered the famous picture and had a look and there it was.
So who did the mustache? You, Robert?
Anonymous
January 20, 2012 at 6:57 am
Thank you, Tina, I think the “outline of a mustache” on my pic is just the bad quality of it. When you look at the wedding picture, you can clearly see that there is not a hint of it. I think I remember that Errol started sporting it only for “Charge”.
Anonymous
January 20, 2012 at 8:26 am
Not I
Anonymous
January 20, 2012 at 2:13 pm
So who gave him the mustache and is tampering with the picture? Which wedding picture do you mean Inga?
Anonymous
January 20, 2012 at 6:13 pm
This one:
